City Settles With Police Sergeants

18 12 2007

It averages out to about $7,900 per officer if distributed evenly.  Talk about a gift from Santa!

    The Springfield City Council approved an out-of-court settlement in closed session Monday, Dec. 17, 2007 that reaches agreement with a group of Springfield police sergeants on back pay for overtime compensation.   Under the agreement, the City will pay $150,000 to 19 Police sergeants named as plaintiffs in the case of Grant Dorrell, et al. vs. City of Springfield, Missouri, in U.S. District Court.  The terms of the agreement include that the City will consider the position of Police Sergeant to be non-exempt and eligible for overtime pay effective Dec. 23, 2007. Each party also is responsible for its own litigation costs and attorneys fees.  The plaintiffs had sought an amount of $260,000 in back pay along with liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, court costs and equitable relief. The case involved differing interpretations of the position of sergeant under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.  The agreement reached after negotiation and non-binding mediation will save the further expenses of court costs and attorneys’ fees had it gone to trial in U.S. District Court.  The amounts paid to the sergeants will be considered compensation and subject to normally required withholdings. The payments will be made on the Dec. 27, 2007 paychecks.





Thoughts On The Pythian Castle Situation

18 12 2007

OK, I’ve had time to look over the documents.  I’ve talked to Tamara Finocchiaro and some of her more vocal supporters.  I’ve talked to Mayor Carlson, I’ve talked to Doug Burlison, I’ve talked to city staff.  This is just my two cents from looking over everything and you can take it for what you’re paying for it!

First, let me state very clearly I want to see Pythian Castle open for business.  I think this is a landmark that is good for the community, that it will be a tourist destination, that it can be a place where civic groups can gather for events that will enhance the community and also be a place where joyful celebrations both public and private can take place.  Having the Castle closed does not do this city a service at all.  I think the city and the ownership of Pythian Castle owe it to the community to get this landmark reopened.

All that said…I don’t think Tamara Finocchiaro and her supporters made their case tonight.  In fact, a few of the things said tonight actually have had the opposite effect and made me question a little more what is going on with this situation.   (Keep in mind we haven’t seen the official city response on this yet.  I’m going on what I heard from them and what I read in the documents.)

The biggest red flag that came up was when Ms. Finocchiaro (and others) claimed the city was trying to make her sign an agreement that was “restricting our rights to sell the property.”  If you hear someone say that it makes you believe the city is saying that you cannot sell your property without the permission of the city.  As you can clearly see in the agreement I posted earlier that is NOT the case.  The agreement’s section 9 (that an older gentleman after meeting was very insistent in telling me it stopped Ms. Finocchiaro from selling her property without city permission) says nothing about stopping Ms. Finocchiaro from actually selling the property.  She can sell it to whomever she wants to sell it at any time.  What this agreement said was that if she sold the property that any permissions from the city to operate business ventures from within the castle would be terminated because the agreement depended on the ownership of the Castle by Ms. Finocchiaro.

If this is going to be a rallying cry for her supporters then it’s going to turn off a lot of people.  They already have the burden of running a business for years without a business license or occupancy permit.  They have to try and prove to the average citizen that they deserve special treatment and don’t have to get the same licenses that every other business in town has to get.  Any other business that tries to run without an occupancy permit or business license wouldn’t get the length of time Ms. Finocchiaro has received with Pythian Castle.  (Just ask the 2nd Stage Theatre about that.)   Anyone who actually reads this agreement will see that the city is not banning her from selling the land but rather saying that whoever takes over the land will have to negotiate their own deal with the city.   That’s not unreasonable and that’s not getting her to say the city has to approve her sale.   If we’re going to have things misrepresented like that it makes you have to question the rest of what is being said from Ms. Finocchiaro and her supporters.

Then you have the whole argument that the city staff is bullying her or overstepping it’s bounds.  I could see where Ms. Finocchiaro and her supporters may feel this is the case but it appears from Ms. Finocchiaro’s own admissions and the listings of services on Pythian Castle’s website that she was operating in parts of the castle that the city had not approved.  It looks from what I’m seeing without even having the city’s formal response that Ms. Finocchiaro was the one overstepping bounds.  Now, I’m a supporter of personal property rights and this was her property but it was also operating as a business which falls under the codes of the City of Springfield.  You can’t just make up your own codes because you don’t like what the city has in place.   There was nothing presented tonight by anyone speaking for Pythian Castle that showed they were not operating in violation of the city codes.

We had speakers getting up and talking about the Castle was “tragically shut down” as if the city swooped in without any justification for their actions.  It left everyone at the media table shaking their heads in disbelief.  You cannot avoid the fact there was no occupancy permit or business license.  The city was completely justified in shutting down the Castle as a place of business.   We can debate the “dangerous building” designation but that does not mean the city wasn’t justified in closing the Castle down.

Neva Schroder from Marshfield came in to say that “Those administering the rules need to have the common sense and the desire to interpret the codes in a fair and impartial manner and in the “spirit of the code.”"  OK, Ms. Schroder, let’s look at how you do that.  You do that by treating Pythian Castle the same as every other business that is required to have an occupancy permit and business license before they open for operations.  If they were fair and impartial then the Castle should never have been doing any business activities in the first place.    Ms. Schroder claimed in her statement that “The city blocked everything and would not leave their desk to go inspect the Castle” but Ms. Finocchiaro herself mentioned walk throughs and inspections of the property.  There was nothing from Ms. Schroder to explain this discrepancy between her statement and Ms. Finocchiaro’s.

And Ms. Schroder’s statement took personal shots at City Council members which seems to have become standard procedure when someone doesn’t like something the city is requiring of them.  It’s petty, it’s childish and all it does is make someone without a dog in the fight stand there and ask if they don’t have anything more firm to stand on than taking a shot at Mary Collette’s fire house.

Bill Schroder’s statement had some meat to it and if it wasn’t for the fact he couldn’t resist taking a shot at city staff I might have looked more favorably on his statement.  Nick Heatherly from the City reportedly said he “has thirteen things he can use stop a business from operating and one violation is enough” and Mr.  Schroder said “that attitude is not business friendly.”  He suggested they put an “attitude adjustment” on their “to do list.”  At that point, this man lost all his credibility with me.  If he was a city council member in Marshfield and chairman of their Planning and Zoning (and I have no reason to think he was not) then he must know that not only was what Mr. Heatherly allegedly accused of saying true but also necessary to enforce the building codes within a city.  Now, if Mr. Schroder’s position is that building codes themselves are not business friendly then it makes sense he would take a shot like this at a city employee who is doing their job.

Mr. Schroder, you had a chance to hit a home run and instead you came off looking like you just had an axe to grind.  I do have to wonder though…based on your statement that you were a City Council member in Marshfield…did you let businesses run for years without occupancy permits and business licenses?  If you did not then I have to question why you’re wanting the City Council of Springfield to do that in this case.  You were obviously against spot zoning…why are you in favor of spot enforcement of codes for permits and licenses?

Now, I’m sure by this point the supporters of the Castle are quite angry at me and don’t believe for a second that I’m on their side in wanting to see the Castle re-opened to the public.  After all, if someone is wanting to see it re-opened then why spend this time shooting holes into their presentation to the city instead of just jumping on the bandwagon?  It’s because the burden of proof here is not on the City of Springfield but rather on Tamara Finocchiaro and the supporters of Pythian Castle.  You needed to bring in an air tight presentation on the steps taken to secure licenses, the plans that were presented to the city, results of inspections, correspondence with the city and a pledge to at least operate within the same confines of the codes that every other business in Springfield operates within every single day.   Instead, we had mostly conjecture, speculation, hearsay and in the case of saying the city was blocking her from selling her property flat out misinformation.

The average person you want to get on your side against the city could care less about the fact someone at the city said dancing wasn’t allowed under the current zoning.  They care about the fact there’s no occupancy permit and no business license and hasn’t been for years.  They care about the fact that apparently the city finally shut down a business that was not operating under the city codes like other city businesses.  They care about little things like the fire department asking for a 26′ wide drive so emergency vehicles can get in and out safely and no viable reason why it shouldn’t be done presented by Pythian Castle ownership.  These are the things you need to show the public and not just scream loudly on the radio or in council chambers that the big mean city is out to get you.

I’m not alone.  I want to support you.  I want to call my council member and ask them why Pythian Castle isn’t getting their permits to open.  However, right now, you haven’t made your case.  Get all the facts in a row, leave out the emotional rhetoric and medieval “storming the castle” references and show myself and other residents clearly and definitively how you’ve been singled out by the city and you’ll find you might have large support.  Until then, the burden is still on you to show us why we should side with a business that operated for years without a license.   Pointing fingers at the city and saying it’s all their fault isn’t going to overcome that.





The Proposed City Agreement Pythian Castle Ownership Rejected

18 12 2007

Here’s the agreement the city offered Tamara Finocchiaro to keep Pythian Castle open despite not having an occupancy permit or business license.  You can download your own version of the PDF: Pythian Castle Rejected Agreement or you can read it below.  When I first scanned it, page 2 wasn’t included but it was on the Jackehammer site and you can click the link to read it there if you don’t want to download the PDF.

pythian-city-1.jpg

Page 2 of the document wasn’t included in my folder of information. Click here to see the missing page 2.

pythian-city-2.jpg
pythian-city-3.jpg





Tamara Finocchiaro’s Statement To City Council

18 12 2007

Here is Tamara Finocchiaro’s statement to City Council tonight. She did go off script to comment about exit signs in the council chamber versus rooms at the Castle about the same size.

pythian-1.jpg

pythian-2.jpg

 





Q&A with Tamara Finocchario

17 12 2007

When I asked about what the city told me in response to questions:  “The refused to give me b permits as mentioned in their response. “

“It was clear by the attitude of the city personnel that we are working in a hostile environment,” Ms. Finnocchario said.  “We have an owner who is clearly desiring to make these upgrades and if the permits had been given would have had them done two years ago.  There is no reason to hold us back from phased developments that were to be completed two years ago.  We passed internal safety inspection in 2005.”

She wouldn’t comment on the record but my feeling is that litigation will be soon forthcoming and escalating.

When I asked if she would be willing to sit down with the city to resolve issues Ms. Finocchario said “Sure.  I would like them to just honor the agreements we had two years ago that said I had a month to put a handrail in, two months to get my secondary hydrant in and six months to get my driveway in.  I want them to honor my agreement.  We had a walk-through in March 25, 2005 and I don’t know we reached this point.  It simply graduated to an excessive amount of drama that doesn’t need to be there.”

She pointed out that city hall has less requirements than her building has for safety measures.

When I asked about the portion of the presentation that said she couldn’t sell property without city permission Ms. Finocchario said “What they didn’t want me to do was sell that property or change my ownership which negated by agreement which was the intention of that clause.”   (I will be posting the entire document later tonight for you to read and I’ll make a few comments as well.)





Springfield City Council Live December 17, 2007

17 12 2007

6:45pm…We’re here and up and running! A large group of teens are here most likely fired up about the skate park issue. Let’s see if they have any actual knowledge of the issue or if they’re just here to say what the people who used to hold the skate park lease told them to say. A group is here to complain about Pythian Castle.

6:47pm…Bill Cantrell comes over to glance at the answers from the city regarding Pythian Castle that I reported earlier today on this blog. Bill’s a decent guy.

6:48pm…Someone comes walking in dressed as the Grinch. Yeah, I’m sure he’s going to be respectful and not try to disrupt the proceedings.

6:49pm…Someone walks around handing out stickers to “support Pythian Castle.” I ask if they’re going to present all the sides of the issue or just theirs. He responds that he thinks that both sides will be shown tonight. Translation: If it is, it won’t be by us. :)

6:53pm…Dan Chiles has a very festive tie. The room is now packed to standing room only.

6:54pm…Some skaters tell me they know the city has the right to do what they’re doing. It’s good to hear that…now those who want to criticize them can’t say the skaters don’t at least know the basis of what is going on.

6:58pm…I don’t think I’ve heard the word “like” used more times in a single sentence when it wasn’t actually being used by its definition.

6:59pm…Councilman Dan Chiles enjoys a serious conversation with a Journal Broadcasting radio host.

7:00pm…Councilman Ralph Manley is still working the room so I doubt we’re starting on time.

7:02pm…Mayor Carlson arrives and takes his seat. I think we’re about to get started.

7:04pm…We’re underway! Ralph Manley prays.

7:05pm…A no show by Cindy Rushefsky.

7:06pm…Two bills removed from the consent agenda to regular first reading bills. Agenda passes 8-0.

7:08pm…Appointments of Bob Scheid to the airport board and Bill Bryan to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Mayor thanks them for volunteering to serve.

7:10pm…City Manager Bob Cumley updates on audit response. Deputy City Manager Evelyn Honea and Cumley are taking it seriously and put together a list of priorities including hiring as a highest priority hiring a city auditor. The top 5: completing software improvements in city loan plan; reviewing announcing controls; reviewing controls of seized property; city service center; city purchasing policies. Asking council for recommendations in changes to those priorities and they will implement changes prior to hiring an internal auditor. Estimate of 60 to 90 days to fill that position.

Cumley promises continued updates to city council regarding the changes made as a result of the audit report. Cumley also wanted to thank the staff for their efforts. He reiterated the employees have been following policies of the council, previous city managers and Cumley himself. He thinks the citizens of Springfield should be proud of our city workers.

Councilman Chiles asked why the police and fire pension plan wasn’t in the top 5. Cumley said it could be in the list and probably could be number one. Cumley said that there are sixteen issues that could be priorities. Chiles asked if Cumley believes it’s a priority but not top 5. Cumley said it’s an item or project they’re working on.

Councilman Chiles asked if the auditor would be a temporary position into a permanent position. The recommendation would be on a contract basis based on the city council’s decision as to give the new city manager a chance to weigh in on the position. (Note: Wasn’t the recommendation of the state auditor that this internal auditor answer to the city council and not to the city manager? If so, it really doesn’t matter what the new city manager thinks about the auditor’s position.)

Councilwoman Collette said that the priorities were set for the internal auditor and not overall. She said that she doesn’t think all of us wouldn’t consider the police/fire pension as the top priority and wanted to point that out.

7:18pm…The Mayor addresses the large crowd that is here about the skate park. The Mayor is suggesting that they take up the skate park bill, Council Bill 2007-365. The Mayor said they had a public hearing two weeks ago and normally they would be voting on the bill tonight. However, the city law department has asked for the bill to be tabled. Mr. Wichmer was asked to explain. He said the R-12 District approached a change that would eliminate the lease and they want a chance to speak to the Skate Park association before moving forward in case this can be resolved through continued mediation. The Mayor said if there was a change from where it is that it would come back to council. Mr. Wichmer said the current bill is really dead and a new bill would be coming to replace it.

Councilman Chiles said that “we’re trying to eliminate some of the issues currently involved in our community.” The answer was they’re trying to simplify the situation between three parties (the city, the school, the skate park association.) Councilman Chiles asked how long it will take and the answer was that hopefully the next council meeting (January 14th) for a first reading. Manley first, Wylie second to table the bill. Unanimous voice vote.

7:24pm…EDITORIAL NOTE (while the room clears)…it’s great to see that they’re going this direction with this. This is a chance for the community to come together for a solution instead of running something through that causes more division and anger. Let’s hope this works out for all involved as best as possible.

7:25pmCouncil Bill 2007-390 and Council Bill 2007-391. Rezoning to allow new accesses for emergency vehicles and for the development (390). Councilman Wylie said he’s supporting it because it’s a good addition to the city. He asked about two issues raised by neighbors and the answer was that they were resolved. Zoning of land to “center city” (391) to allow development. This zoning will allow the development not to put in off-street parking. Councilwoman Collette asked what the major result of the zoning would be and if it is connected to parking. (This is the University Plaza where they’re going to be building the new BKD building.)

7:30pmCouncil Bill 2007-392 and Council Bill 2007-396. Promotion of recycling with centralized location and approval of the city manager to get a grant to start the Center Street Recycling Coalition. Included in the Coalition is Drury, OTC, Springfield R-12 School District, Springfield/Greene County Library, Greene County and Board of Public Utilities. Councilwoman Collette praised the coalition and asked if it can be opened up to the surrounding area. The answer is that this is a pilot program and they can look at involving a bigger part of the community in the future. Ms. Collette asked if Drury already had a program like this and Barbara Lutz came to address it. She said that this is a beginning and there is a strong interest in including other institutions but once it’s up and running they will look at it. She was familiar with Drury and said that all of them are in various stages of recycling and that “this is a chance to really kick it in.”

Councilman Chiles asked if this can be expanded to downtown Springfield “where people gather and the senseless trash containers are conspicuous.” Answer was that they have a couple efforts they are looking at for downtown and they hope to roll out a pilot project on Earth Day 2008. Mr. Chiles asked if portable recycling containers could be available and the answer was that there are some already available. Councilman Chiles asked if this is something that could eventually be self-sustaining when it comes to cost. The answer was that they have contracts with vendors interested in materials and that that it’s possible in the future if the market does not bottom out.

The Tindle building is where this is planning to be done because it’s a central location to the entities involved in the Coalition. The idea is that it would be available to students, parents and even people just passing by the site.

The grant would allow the city manager to get 100 recycling bins to place around the city and expand what the city collects. The bill was labeled emergency because of the grant deadline and the city does not have to match anything.

Councilman Burlison asked Mr. Wichmer if he needed to recuse because he was on the committee of the board and the answer was yes.

Vote was 7-0 in favor with Burlison abstaining.

7:40pm…Council Bill 2007-415. A bill authorizing an amendment to the Ground Lease, Operating Agreement and Option to Purchase agreement of May 2, 2005 for baseball parking north of St. Louis and south of East Trafficway. The sale of this land would generate $1.8 million for the city. Passes on 8-0 vote.

7:45pmCouncil Bill 2007-401. Seeking authorization to condemn to obtain right of way to construct sewers in the Hunt Branch Trunk Sewer Project.

Attorney John Carnahan addressed the council. He represents the Bryant family who is just south of Highway 60 and just east of Highland Springs. Their office has been working with the city attorney on this project hoping to get final resolution and asks that the bill be tabled because the area in question is very sensitive environmental area. A series of springs run through the Hunt Branch and a large artesian well plus a cave system on the property that includes a spring in the cave. Their concern is if they come through blasting it could destroy the caves and the well. Also, they believe that this is a location of Ozark Cave Fish of which there is only about 20 remaining sites for these fish.

Councilman Chiles said this sounds of tremendous value and asked if the lawyer has hired engineering firms. The answer was that they had not because this was agricultural land and no development was planned and the city has not responded to the requests. They recognize they want to bring the sewer there because of gravity flow but the water also flows that way. Mayor Carlson asked if there was a time frame involved and the answer from the staff was that they want to move forward with this. They said they purposely put the sewer line across the stream from the artesian well and went to the other side of the valley. Attorney Carnahan said they were only about 70 feet from the well. The Mayor suggested that someone address the concerns of Mr. Carnahan and no vote was going to be taken tonight as it was a first reading bill. Action to be taken at the January 14th meeting.

7:54pmCouncil Bill 2007-393. Approval of the City of Springfield’s Legislative Policy for 2008. Councilman Chiles asked if the attachment was on the website to show the complete bill with priorities and table of contents. If the council acts tonight, Ms. Cirtin said it will be on the website by tomorrow. Bill passes 8-0.

7:56pmCouncil Bill 2007-394. Establishment of a Citizen’s Solid Waste Committee. The committee makes recommendations to the City Council. One of the things considered would be franchising solid waste collection in the city of Springfield. Councilman Wylie moved to delete Exhibit A and attached an amended Exhibit A. The changes are that the committee members were not all confirmed as serving so some names were removed. The motion to amend was approved. Councilman Deaver said they’re using the template that has been used in the past for citizen groups looking at issues that face the city. Many of the people on the committee have served the community in the past on solid waste issues and Mr. Deaver believes this will be a benefit to the city.

Councilman Chiles commended Mr. Deaver for taking leadership of this. Mr. Chiles then said in reference to an issue in today’s newspaper and wanted the city to clear up what was said. The answer was that if the commission decides to look into franchising trash collection that it would be a two year process before they could reach anything with it. Bill passes 8-0.

8:01pmCouncil Bill 2007-395. The bill to authorize the City Manager Search Committee. Mayor Pro-Tem Deaver thanked the citizens who applied to be on the board and said the board had a good makeup to represent a wide variety of the community. Councilman Wylie said they had some good sources of information for a starting point for this process.

8:02pm…I’m shown a manila folder that the “Save The Castle” group plan to present to the city council tonight. The owner of the Castle plans to ask the City Council to recind the action of January 20, 2005 to rezone the property from Government/Commercial to Planned Development and also to recind the earlier action of January 31, 2006 to approve the property as an Administrative Subdivision.

8:07pm… The Mayor thanked Mayor Pro-Tem Deaver for his efforts. The Mayor said he was on the search committee who hired Dr. Nietzel at MSU and that the committee was making sure the committee might have face to face interviews with more than five but that they would narrow down to five final candidates. Mr. Deaver said that was the case and that it could be as low as three. However, Mr. Deaver wanted to give the committee as much lee-way as possible. Resolution approved 8-0.

8:09pmCouncil Bill 2007-363. Passes 8-0.

8:10pmCouncil Bill 2007-364. (These bills are letting park rangers have enforcement powers.) Passes 8-0.

8:11pmCouncil Bill 2007-365. This brings in $1.5 million to the city from a settlement with a phone company. $500,000 is going into the police/fire pension program. The Mayor wanted to correct the record in regards to the statement nothing has been done to fix the issue. He said the council over the last two years has done a lot for this issue. That while it’s not been solved it’s incorrect to say that nothing has been done.

“When the situation became as large as it did, the council made several unpopular and tough decisions but they have had an effect,” Mayor Carlson said. “The basic problem of the police/fire pension program was that the money wasn’t being invested the way professional fund managers invest this money across the United States. The members of the board took an overly conservative approach and as a result did not return the same return as other funds in the country.”

The Mayor also said the benefits approved turned out to be benefits that the fund basically couldn’t pay for and that Mr. Cumley mentioned in his article in the News-Leader that there is plenty of blame to go around on that. The actuaries at the time told City Council they could afford the benefits and then came back later and said they could not do it.

The Mayor said over the objections of the police and fire staff the City Council put more professional investment people on the board and that the pension fund is now more aggressive and returning a better yield for investment.

The Mayor spoke of a lot of different funds and then asked if there is enough from what the city puts in and what the fund gets now to fully fund benefits and that it is. The Mayor said he’s not trying to diminish the importance of this but that if the city shut down tomorrow that the police/fire would get their pensions.

“The real question is what is the prudent way to deal with this issue at the present time? Should we panic? Should we act like the little red hen that said the sky is falling?” Mayor Carlson said. “Should we go to the voters and ask if they want to pay a special tax to deal with this?”

The Mayor believes it creates a totally false impression to say it hasn’t been attended to and that it has for the last two or three years.

“And if you were on the council you would know that,” Mayor Carlson said.

Councilman Chiles that said within our lifetimes, all of our federal tax dollars will go to entitlements, pensions, payments on debt and Medicare/Social Security because of over-promises. Mr. Chiles said that we need to take care of our police and firemen and that we need to try and work through the difficulties now. Councilman Chiles said that no one’s in the mood for a tax to fund this and that it’s not a good option. He said that they need to look through every nickel in this budget and find a way to fix it. Plus, Mr. Chiles said that they’re working under a mandate from the state government where they have to make a mandatory contribution or the state will seize the city’s sales tax revenue to pay for it.

Mr. Chiles said going forward they need to make sure this covered so they don’t face that in the future.

The bill passed 8-0.

8:27pmCouncil Bill 2007-387. Transfer of funds in the Convention and Visitor’s Bureau budget. Passes 8-0.

8:28pmCouncil Bill 2007-388. Sale of land to the Jordan Valley Community Health Center. The L.E. Cox building is being sold in part to JVCHC at the appraised value of the property. The city is doing environmental work on the building to make sure there is no lead paint or other environmental issues. This bill says if issues come up in the next six months that the city would work with the previous owner to correct those problems. It also gives the JVCHC the right to purchase 20,000 additional square feet in the building that would house the Crime Lab.

Councilwoman Collette said that she hoped that local advocates were as happy now as with the changes as with the previous bill.

Mayor Carlson asked how much the city paid for the building when bought. Answer: About 2.2 million. The Mayor asked what they’re getting back with the sale of this portion of the building. Answer: 1.64 million. (Note: this isn’t the entire building…there is still 20,000 square feet left to sell at $22 a square foot which is $440,000.)

The Mayor said they bought the building with a federal grant and spent a few hundred thousand to clean up the building. The result has been that Missouri State brought new jobs to downtown that increased city revenue. (Mayor Carlson sent this correction: “I was talking about the old MFA building that we clean up and then sold to Missouri State University to put in the JVIC technology center that eventually resulted in $30 million in downtown development.”  I apologize for having that wrong.)

The Mayor said the long term plan was very successful and that $6-8 dollars of outside investment went into development for every dollar the city spent.

Councilman Chiles asked if these deals give the city something to do with the furniture that the auditor was critical of and the answer was that this money would go to start Phase One of the training program facility. Councilman Chiles asked about the location of the morgue and if this is a place to put the morgue. The answer was the Medical Examiner’s office is looking at alternatives but that everyone agrees it should be as close to the crime lab as possible. Discussions are ongoing. Passes 8-0.

8:40pmCouncil Bill 2007-389. This enforces a boundary agreement between the city of Springfield and the city of Willard. Also speaks to all claims related to the City intervention in a matter between Willard and the Missouri Public Service Commission. Passes 8-0.

8:46pm…Various speakers and the Mayor wanted to group them by subject. Five speakers were here for the Skate Park and the Mayor said they were welcome to speak. The Mayor moved to have the Pythian Castle issue addressed.

8:47pm…Judy Friend spoke on her disappointment that her group couldn’t hold a fund raiser at the Castle because it was shut down. She talked about contributions made by the owner of the Castle to charities and said that the owner has done a “brillant job of restoring the castle.” Ms. Friend claims that there has been improper administration of Planning and Zoning codes and employees have placed roadblocks she feels are unacceptable. She asked the City Council to move to reopen the Castle. She claimed there were heavy handed tactics by city employees. She claimed that the building is a castle and should be treated differently than other buildings because it was a “unique treasure.” She said it is a historic building and therefore exempt from rules.

8:51pm…Neva Schroder of Marshfield. “We are not knights but we are here to defend the Castle.” She said that even though the city zoning ordinance is 437 pages it is impossible to write codes that perfectly describe everything. She asked the rules be interpreted in a fair and impartial manner and in the “spirit of the code.” (Note: Doesn’t a “fair and impartial manner” mean treating this the same as anything else?) She spoke about how well the Castle fits in a GI zone and that they could have issued a variance or special use to allow dancing knowing that it was an activity at USO dances dating back to 1913. She mentioned property owned by Council Members that have the same zoning code. (Mayor Carlson corrected her that he didn’t own what she claimed.) She claimed the city wanted the owner to require the city to approve if she sold or took a loan on the property and when she refused they shut her down.

8:56pm…Bill Schroder of Marshfield. A former Marshfield council member and planning and zoning board member. He said P&Z is not treating the castle like an existing structure that has been designed, built and previously occupied. He said they are requiring things that only make sense in new construction. He spoke of the driveway issue (which we obtained an answer from the city on and posted earlier today) and the capacity issue (also addressed earlier today.) He said the city is not being welcoming to business and needs to put a better attitude on their “to do” list. He claimed the city has not given usable permits to make the improvements they require. He said that Tamara was publicly discredited and that the city needs to rescind earlier actions.

9:01pm…Tamara Finocchiaro, owner of Pythian Castle. (Some of her complaints can be seen here.) She spoke about the castle and how contractors are awed by the unique design. She claims Nick Heatherly said “This project is simply new to us. We were confused by it.”

“Just because it is different does not mean it is unsafe,” Ms. Finocchiaro said. “Just because it is not common does not mean it is not current.”

She asked for a list of items that I will list in a blog that will post later today.

She asked why the city took the path of most resistance labeling the castle a “dangerous property” and why they wrote non-negotiable agreements restricting her rights to sell the property.

“I’m a professional dancer,” she said. “Believe me when I say I could jump through hoops. But I can’t jump through the hoops of red tape put up by this city.”

Applause began and the Mayor asked people not to do that and to show decorum in the council chambers. He asked Mr. Cumley to respond to how the issue can be dealt with and he said it’s up to the Mayor.

9:08pm…City Staff responded by saying they want to respond but they don’t have time to do it. “This isn’t about little girl’s dreams or orphans or soldiers. It’s about process which the owner of Pythian Castle refused to follow.” He said she operated without permits and she didn’t submit plans for final approval which means she didn’t get the permits. She did not have a business license.

The agreement was addressed. “We were going to allow her to operate without a business license and a certificate of occupancy if there was an agreement to finish the three years of projects that have not even been started.” They said she was booking events with people beyond her own stated occupancy levels. He said the city was told by her attorney that she was ready to sell or shut down. He said she refused the limited use agreement and with that the city told her to shut down. They allowed a fire marshall for events so they could stay open when they didn’t have approvals for fire exits.

He also said that while her plans talked of a room on the first floor for 60 people she advertised on her website a theatre on the second floor that was not approved for use by the city. He said she had a road that the fire department said was not usable. The fire hydrants in question: one is old and needs to be tested and the other is on the armory property and they put up a fence after 9/11. “If she can get the armory to cut a hole in their fence that’s fine with us.”

He said that eventually this had to come to an end without permits and this fall was this time. Even after they said they were shut down, the city came out and found a tour on a floor that people should not have been on and that’s when the city shut her down. The city staff said they would prepare a full report for council. He said they were sorry it came to this point but there are several issues involved.

The Mayor asked about the Zoning issue that they wanted recinded and asked if the owner doesn’t like the present zoning if there is something that prohibits her from filing for a change. The answer was no, she can file to change the zoning.

City staff added that they are using International Building Codes and that some of the issues related to her Castle the city will not budge on because it affects “life safety.” The Mayor asked if someone didn’t like the building code what they can do. The answer was the staff didn’t think there was a way to get around it. They did concede an engineer could come in and show something different than the city has seen now.

The Mayor said “OK, so if you’re going to make a change on the fire code for one person it has to be for all people?” The answer was they couldn’t speak for the fire department but that if they changed for one person they would have to change for all people. The Mayor asked for a letter from city staff on the issue. The Mayor said they do not have the authority according to city charter to act on this. All the council can do is change the law. They can ask the city manager to look into the matter but that’s all they can do.

“We can’t just say ‘cut ‘em a deal over here’.” Mayor Carlson said. “It would be unlawful if we did.”

Councilwoman Collette asked if there is a way to get the info the City Council will receive to the people in attendance who are supporting the Castle. (This blog will try to get this information as well.) She wants to know if they can make some considerations and still protect public safety. She asked Brenda Cirtin how that information can be released to the public. Brenda Cirtin said something would have to be on file and the city clerk could release that information. She also said people could give their address to the city clerk and have the information sent to them.

Councilman Chiles asked if there was any provision to provide mediator who can sit between two parties and have them work through issues. The answer was there is nothing in their process to allow for mediation.

9:24pm…Ronald Ard spoke about fixing a sidewalk.

Council went into a closed session.





Oh Goody. Condos.

17 12 2007

The developer of the Heer’s Tower says he’s putting in condos.

(begin imaging my voice with a sarcastic tone now)

Oh, what a great benefit to the average resident of Springfield.  Nothing says “major downtown landmark that’s a big part of city history” quite like condos.

(end sarcastic tone)





It Could Get Pyth-y At City Council Tonight

17 12 2007

It could get very interesting at City Council tonight when supporters of Tamara Finocchiaro & Pythian Castle storm the gates.  If you don’t know what’s going on between Ms. Finocchiaro and the city, in a nutshell the city has shut down Pythian Castle and the events inside like weddings and anniversary parties for a series of “violations.”

I’ve spoken to both sides on the issue and it should make for an interesting spectacle tonight at city council.   After hearing from both Ms. Finocchiaro and the response from the city when I asked about it I can say there’s a clear divide between the two sides.  Here’s some examples (Pythian Castle’s claim first, city response second):

PC: “1) Width of driveway. They kept requesting 26′ wide, when a code requires 20′. All my neighbors only have 18′ wide ones. We wanted 20′ to allow more room for parking, something we really need.”

City:  “There is a difference between a driveway and a fire apparatus road. Fire Dept requires access to the site and sufficient space to maneuver a fire truck.”

PC:  “We disagree on capacity. They want to limit me to 60 people. By code and the type of building I have, my capacity should be 300. After that, I would have to sprinkler the building for addtional capacity. There limitation was set by existing parking spaces. Absolutely nothing to do with building safety. Hence, why we have been applying for more parking since August of 2004. Just for the record, our building is almost 40,000 square feet. Made of solid stone construction with concrete floors, ceilings and roof with fire proof block as internal walls. Each meeting room is 2500 square ft. We are one of the only buildings listed as fireproof in the assessors log. To limit us to such an rediculous capacity for such a safe building is nothing more than unfair economic sanctioning. I have asked that we get no more special treatment than the businesses in downtown. None of which have as much parking as us, nor the square footage, nor the fireproof construction as we do. But, what they have is a parking variance given to downtown establishments. They told me if I went through the planned development zoning, they had the freedom to grant me the same variance, hence why it was required. Needlesstosay, they have not followed through with that idea.”

City: “She chose to submit phased plans. Plans submitted by her for the first phase shows limited use of the first floor only and 60 occupants. The entire building will certainly have a higher occupancy number, but she has submitted no plans for use of the rest of the building.”

PC: “While negotiating these terms, we have received numerous letters stating they have made efforts to work with us, but we have refused to make any effort. They don’t recognize our numerous submittals as attempts. Hence we are in violation of code compliance and will be shut down. To date we have been allowed to operate because we were in due process and we had done nothing to slow the process, it simply was a long and arduous one. As well as an impossible one to overcome. We are sure if we get the easement, there will be another requirement simply don’t even know about right now.”

City: “I know of no letters that say she has refused to make any effort. We have noted the need for plan revisions and that she was not to operate her business yet. The reason for shutting her down is that she was not legal to open in the first place. There are zoning, building, and fire code issues that remain. She has no approved plans, no permits to construct improvements, no certificate of occupancy, and no business license.”

The city answers came from Building Development Services.

So it’s clear there’s a disconnect in the situation and I think it’s too early to tell on which side the fault lies (perhaps a little on both.)  Hopefully tonight won’t be an all out gripe fest but rather a chance to get the parties in the same room and get a clear plan in place to get the Castle open again.  I don’t think anyone would say it’s good for the city to have Pythian Castle closed when it can be such a benefit to the community as a whole.





Another Christmas Story

16 12 2007

This post is similar to the Ten Days post I made but I wanted to share this story.

There was a guy we’ll call Chris.  Chris was having what you could call a bad year.  His marriage split up during the summer and he was living alone in a town a thousand miles from his family.  The holidays were coming and because his divorce was scheduled to be final in the early part of November he knew it was likely he’d have to spend the time without his children around for the first time since they were born.   All in all, Chris wasn’t looking toward a festive Christmas season.

At the tail end of November’s second week, the divorce was rushed through and his marriage was over after almost ten years.   That, in itself, can be enough to drive someone into a feeling of depression and despair but fate wasn’t quite done with Chris.

The Saturday after Thanksgiving Chris skipped his Saturday afternoon nap to go Christmas shopping for his children.  While he was out his cell phone rang with a call from his landlord.  His apartment had caught fire and almost everything was ruined.  He dropped everything and rushed back across Springfield to his apartment to see if anything could be salvaged.   While he was driving back his parents called.  His grandmother…his last living grandparent…had just died.

The apartment was  an almost total loss.  A 750 square foot apartment full of “stuff” was reduced to some soot covered items that in the entirety fit on the 50 square feet of tile in the kitchen with space left over.  All but two pairs of pants were ruined.  Over a thousand CDs had been burned including some that were one of a kind demos and autographed items.  Over 500 DVDs melted.  TV gone.  Surround sound stereo gone.  DVD/VCR gone.  Furniture gone.

Over the next month, the landlord dragged their feet on repairs.  All the carpet in the apartment was ripped out because of the water damage from the fire department putting out the fire.  The furnace wasn’t cleared to run because the landlord had not cleared it from soot and possible fire damage.  Multiple times it was suggested that Chris just buy out his lease (with eight months remaining) and just move out.  Chris, broke from the divorce and deep in debt because of it, couldn’t afford it.  He could barely pay bills each month.  He had no insurance so there was no way to replace the items lost or to pay for repairs to his apartment himself.

So Chris spent most of December sleeping in the walk-in closet of his apartment because there were no blinds on the windows.  (They were destroyed in the fire.)  The floor was concrete and there was no heat because he didn’t know if he could start it without risk of carbon monoxide.

If that wasn’t enough his car’s engine blew ten days before Christmas.  Fortunately, his employer took pity on him and lent him a company vehicle so that he could get to work.

You could say that Chris had reached a low point.  Can you imagine what was going through this man’s mind at the time?  Broke and alone a thousand miles from his family.  Sleeping in an apartment that smelled so strongly of smoke that he could barely stand it.  Less than two weeks until a Christmas where you were supposed to have your children but knowing that you couldn’t take them for visitation in that apartment.  Even if he did take them he only had one small gift for each of his children and nothing with which to entertain them because all their toys, the TV, CD player and radio were all destroyed.

His landlord apparently hadn’t realized Chris was living in the apartment and that other residents of the complex saw what was going on because when they discovered he was there after almost three weeks they rushed in and made the repairs in less than a week.   (They actually expected him to believe they didn’t know he was there even though their managers walked past every day.)  So with a few days before Christmas Chris could at least have his children come on Christmas Day.  He prepared to ask his ex-wife to send some toys with the boys so they had something to do when they came for the week long visit.

Then the Christmas miracles began to arrive.

Chris had been attending a “mega church” with over a thousand members.  None of the church members showed up during the first three weeks of Chris’s situation with food, clothing or necessities.  No one visited him to make sure he was OK.  The place that should have surrounded him with love, support and prayer left him virtually alone save for one pastor who would come up to him at services on Wednesday nights and ask how he was doing.

One afternoon this pastor called and asked if he could come by the church.  When Chris arrived, the pastor said that someone in the church had heard about his situation and no one had helped him so they bought a futon and chair from Wal*Mart for him.  Now, Chris had a bed for his children when they came to visit.   He felt blessed that he would not have to tell his ex-wife that he and the children were sleeping on the floor.

That was only the first of two miracles.

Chris had played fantasy baseball in various leagues for the previous ten years.  Most of the leagues were one season in length but one league had been going on almost five years.   When you have a group of folks connected for that many years things usually begin to move beyond just the mutual hobby and you get to know family, kids, personal likes and dislikes and more.  They became a group of friends.  It turned out this group of friends was going to make sure that the memories Chris had of his first Christmas after the divorce was not just him and his kids in a bare apartment.

Chris was at work when one of his co-workers said he needed to come to the lobby because there was a very big package for him.  He walked out to find a box that was four feet high.  It was his lunch break so he loaded into a truck and took it home.

Inside was a note from one of the guys in his baseball league.  Over the previous two weeks, they all mailed checks to this league member so he could buy something from them to make sure Chris’s kids had something to do when they came to visit him.  Inside the box was a 27 inch TV, DVD player and DVDs for the kids including their favorite cartoon: Spongebob Squarepants.   These folks had never met Chris in person.  They had rarely done more than talk online during their game simulations and drafts.  Yet these people came together when he was in need to provide something that while it wasn’t a necessity was a blessing that brought Chris to tears.  Chris ended up having a wonderful Christmas as co-workers started showing up with gifts for his children.

So like I challenged you in the other post, there are people like Chris all around you.  We all like to get an unexpected gift or something that just tells someone else they matter.  It’s a chance for us in our blessings to share with others who might be facing hard times in their lives.  It’s something you can do year ’round but it’s especially gracious when you can help offset what might be a bleak Christmas for someone.





The Cumley Letter Is Out

16 12 2007

The Bob Cumley is out in the Sunday edition of the News-Leader as I had been told it would be.  I particularly enjoy how instead of putting his full name under his photo they just put “Bob.”  I wonder if the next time we see a photo of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or Matt Blunt if we’ll see them captioned simply “Hillary” or “Barack” or “Matt.”  Seeing those would also be good for a laugh.

As City Manager, I would expect Mr. Cumley to bring a letter like this to his staff and to the public.  The mark of someone who is good in leadership is knowing when to have the backs of their team in public while perhaps being a little harder within the walls of their company.  Just like you would not want your boss to bring your shortcomings out in public so too does he have the backs of his people.  I’d do the same thing for my people when I was in positions of management and still do it today.  I can respect that.

Mr. Cumley mentions a lot of facts regarding economic development in Springfield and says that regarding the success of “calculated risks” of development that I believe they have and will, but history will be the final judge.”  Now, I’m no accountant…but from listening to State Auditor Susan Montee it sounded like many of the calculations of risk in some of these situations were not completely taken into account.  Many times Montee mentioned that decisions were made without adequate plans for how loans would be played back or how debt service was handled within the city.  It makes me wonder just how much the calculations were done in regards to the situations raised by Cumley.  How much WERE the risks calculated?

I don’t doubt the crime lab will help law enforcement in the region.  I’m for just about anything that will help our police get their job done faster and more efficently.  You can’t deny the state crime lab is overwhelmed and drops the ball in many cases because of the massive workload.  The new College Station project will draw people to downtown and help put some money into the downtown economy.  It will benefit restaurants and other downtown businesses.  Yes, there is good that has been done and I know that many time the extreme critics of the city in their zeal to condemn will miss or ignore the good aspects of things.  Still, Mr. Cumley, it doesn’t mean that we can ignore the process of how we reached the point these items are in existence and ask the questions about whether it was the right path to walk.   “Second guessing” council, as you put it Mr. Cumley, is a vital and necessary part of a community where the leaders answer to the citizens.

As for the last part of his letter, I’ll just say this regarding the situation.  Over the last few months of doing this blog I’ve had the chance to interact with many residents of Springfield of all political stripes and persuasions.  I’ve talked to Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians and those who despise all parties.  I’ve talked to liberals, conservatives, independents, libertarians and those who can’t categorize themselves with any political label.   Almost all of them are concerned with having a better city for everyone and they are willing to discuss the issues and hear all sides of the debate.

However, there is a small pocket of the argument who appear to be driven by anger and hate that refuse to listen to opposing views, ridicule anyone who dares to stand up them and who absolutely loathe when they are held to the same level of accountability they demand in other people.  These are the people who were waiting for the report from Susan Montee because they wanted to file criminal charges on people and throw people in jail.  They’re the same ones that after the report when Montee said there was no basis for criminal charges said they wanted to go after them anyway and then proceeded to start singling out city employees beyond the leadership and calling for them to be fired.  They did what they could to harass employees who may have done wrong intentionally or unintentionally to try and chase them from the city costing them a job and hurting both that person and their family without any regard for how this could hurt that employee’s spouse or children.  They have no problem publicly running someone down for little more than their own jollies.

The whole truth does not matter to these people and no matter what our city manager puts in the newspaper or no matter what is actually in the audit reports they will not stop.   As much as they say they love the city and want it to be the best they care little about the actual city residents who work for it to make it a better place.  It’s much easier to sit on the sidelines and throw insults at people (many times with incorrect or misleading information) instead of getting out and actually doing things to improve it themselves.

To be clear, I’m not talking about all people who are critical of the city and things they do (although I know certain people who will rush to this blog to claim that is what I’m doing because it’s a standard defense for this extreme group of people.)  We need to have citizens that keep a careful eye on the government, who are vigilant in attending city council meetings and seeking the whole truth about a situation and not just the opinion of a loud mouth who is more focused on hurting others than helping them.  I’m speaking of the people who are rubbing their hands with glee at the idea of city employees losing their jobs and not being able to support their families.  The ones that are wishing pain upon other residents of the city…other human beings.  The ones who claim they’re Christians but are focused on causing pain for other people with all they do and say instead of tempering their judgment with mercy like instructed by the Bible they claim to follow.  It’s only a very loud, very small part of this debate and their fifteen minutes are about three minutes overdone.

While I understand where Mr. Cumley is coming from in his comments and I don’t think they’re invalid in what he said I don’t think it’s really good for him to be focused on them.  It’s time for those critical of the city to join with those pro-city and tell these extremists they are not doing any good for the community with their divisiveness and hate.  We have real problems and we need real solutions and sitting around trying to hurt other people (as was done this week to one city employee) is not going to help us move forward but rather cause more destruction to the city.  Let’s focus on making things better and that means we need to silence the hate but not the criticism.